http://ofyourdeath.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] ofyourdeath.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] tothetune2009-11-24 09:08 am

From The Editor's Floor: My Chemical Romance

HOMELAND INSECURITY: THE DAY MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE'S FRANK IERO MET THE MEN IN BLACK

MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE are putting the final touches to their follow-up of 2007's majestic The Black Parade. During a break in the studio, guitarist FRANK IERO recalls some of the great highs and lows he experienced during their break. Some of those experiences--good and bad--revolved around writing, recording and touring with his side-project, LEATHERMOUTH, whose debut album XO, appeared on Epitaph earlier this year. The good was that he honed his home-recording skills, did a lot of writing (which has helped inform MCR's next disc) and became a maniac frontman while Leathermouth were on tour with REGGIE AND THE FULL EFFECT during the summer of 2008.

The bad? Well, as the guitarist has made clear in interviews, Leathermouth are his vehicle for unfiltered ranting (i.e. "Sunsets Are For Muggings," "Your Friends Are Full Of Shit"). But it was track No. 4 on XO, "I Am Going To Kill The President Of The United States Of America" (about George W. Bush), which earned Iero a visit from the Secret Service. Wondering what happens next?

"The government comes to your house, searches everything and talks to your wife for hours," says Iero, adjusting the sleeves on his hoodie. "Then you have to get a real expensive attorney to keep you out of prison for five years. I had a long talk with the gentlemen of the Secret Service. [It was the] straight-up dark suits, sunglasses, Men In Black-vibe--I thought they were going to do the mind-erase thing [like in the movie].

"They said, 'Why did you write the song?' And I told them the truth. I was on tour [overseas] with My Chem at the time, and every time I turned around, there were Anti-American rallies. I wrote a song from the standpoint of the rest of the world. It wasn't from my personal point of view--it was just from someone who sees warmongering going on. I wrote the song, and the title is as blatant as humanly possible, because I wanted it to be that way. The Secret Service asked, 'Do you think someone is going to hear this song and kill the president?' And I said if they're going to kill the president, they're going to do it without listening to this song. That's like saying everyone who reads Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal is going to eat a baby. They didn't think that was too intelligent, so they said, 'Well, if you re-release the record with the song on it or perform the song live ever again, you'll be arrested."

What's really perplexing about the whole incident is how the agency even learned about the song in the first place. Iero says he's not sure who it was, but opines that it was a British writer who contacted the Office of Homeland Security looking for a comment. Clearly, Iero could've turned the whole thing into a massively public freedom-of-speech argument; now, he's just happy the whole thing is behind him. "I'm married and I want to have kids," he resigns. "I don't want to go to jail for five years." --Jason Pettigrew

source

[identity profile] tempore.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 05:15 pm (UTC)(link)
That's not freedom of speech if saying certain things is made illegal. It's still censorship. Sanctioned by the government or not, it's censorship to prevent someone from voicing an opinion, desire, or intent.

Stating an intention means nothing, it's the action which follows it up. Iero never made any attempt to kill anyone.

[identity profile] thebiologicshow.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)
Even if you're just joking around with your friends and say "I'm going to kill you", if a cop hears you and thinks you're serious, they can intervene.

If John Wilkes Booth or Lee Harvey Oswald had told someone that they were planning on killing the president, do you honestly think that no one should have done anything? That it should just be glossed over because it hadn't happened yet? Like I said, we know that Frank wasn't actually planning on killing someone, but as far as the Secret Service knows, he very well could have been just another crazy dude with a serious plan. The fact that any time someone voices a desire to murder a president, it's taken seriously - that's saved presidents' lives more than once.

It's one statement. It's not like it makes freedom of speech nonexistent. You can say literally anything else without repercussions. In plenty of other countries you wouldn't even be allowed to say you don't like your leader, and you're getting worked up because you think someone should be allowed to say they're going to kill that leader? Doesn't make much sense.

[identity profile] tempore.livejournal.com 2009-11-24 05:30 pm (UTC)(link)
It's not freedom if you can't express your every thought. That doesn't mean there aren't consequences, but in this case, the threat of jail makes it not freedom.

But I don't want to argue, you make excellent points about what should or should not be investigated. But intimidation tactics and threats in return aren't any less terroristic and terrible, especially when you consider that not everyone who expresses these thoughts carelessly or otherwise, have the money to pay for the expensive lawyer and keep them out of jail.

It's still censorship and it's not freedom of speech at the end of the day. Feel free to continue the debate so everyone else can see both sides and make their own decisions; but I'm stopping here, as I'm just repeating myself, more or less, and I'm already feeling angry and frazzled, which isn't fair to you or anyone else -- it has nothing to do with this, and I can't reason or react clearly.