http://ofyourdeath.livejournal.com/ (
ofyourdeath.livejournal.com) wrote in
tothetune2009-12-03 07:21 pm
Entry tags:
Gerard in Rock Sound

MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE
Interview: Andrew Kelham
Have you thought about how My Chemical Romance will reintroduce themselves to music fans in 2010? Do you ever wonder if your band is still needed in music?
Says Gerard Way (vocals):
"It's funny because the musical landscape is ever changing, but I think there's always a place for us and I think we're absolutely needed, especially now. I don't say that with any arrogance, I just really believe in my band and I believe that our band does what it does better than anybody else. There's no one that can do this like us. I feel a gap when we are gone and I hope people do too, if they don't then we're not doing our job properly. I think we're absolutely needed, but I'm glad we're coming back in 2010 because, as much as people need us, I think they needed a break from us too. I hope we got the balance of that right."
What have you tried to achieve with your forthcoming fourth album? How is it different from you past work?
"With this record we tried to ignore all the cosmetic nonsense and focus on becoming a truly great rock band. We felt that the world needed a really straight and pure rock band, you're hard pressed to find a lot of those these days. It was less about the theatricality and more about how we become the greatest young American rock band musically."
How are you adapting to fatherhood?
"It's great, it's amazing. Obviously we just wanted a healthy baby, but I was excited to have a girl as there are things I can see myself helping a girl with that I could never do with a guy, things like picking out clothes and stealing eyeliner, all that sort of stuff!"
Mod note: As happy and excited as we are that people are starting to discuss and converse in the comments, we'd like to remind everyone to play nicely.

no subject
there are things I can see myself helping a girl with that I could never do with a guy, things like picking out clothes and stealing eyeliner, all that sort of stuff
On the one hand, this is kind of cute. On the other, it is yet another example of conforming to societal gender roles. Sigh.
no subject
no subject
no subject
right? Right? but, I mean, let's take this with a grain of salt - I'm sure this is a clipped interview, right? The guy had to have asked Gerard more than three questions. Perhaps he waxed rhapsodic thereafter about gender roles and the guy just drifted off in his head?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-03 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 19:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 19:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 19:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 20:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
His assumption about things he could see himself doing or not doing with a guy rather than a girl says more about himself-- maybe he'd be intimidated by sharing this with his son for any number of reasons that he doesn't from a girl, in large part because to an extent, I'm willing to bet he sees his wife in his daughter, or maybe he sees himself as more of a girl?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2009-12-03 07:43 pm (UTC)(link)- K. Does not have a journal.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 19:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 20:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 20:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 20:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2009-12-03 20:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
replying to self because I can't edit:
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)