Gerard in Rock Sound

[ofyourdeath.livejournal.com]

MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE
Interview: Andrew Kelham

Have you thought about how My Chemical Romance will reintroduce themselves to music fans in 2010? Do you ever wonder if your band is still needed in music?
Says Gerard Way (vocals):
"It's funny because the musical landscape is ever changing, but I think there's always a place for us and I think we're absolutely needed, especially now. I don't say that with any arrogance, I just really believe in my band and I believe that our band does what it does better than anybody else. There's no one that can do this like us. I feel a gap when we are gone and I hope people do too, if they don't then we're not doing our job properly. I think we're absolutely needed, but I'm glad we're coming back in 2010 because, as much as people need us, I think they needed a break from us too. I hope we got the balance of that right."

What have you tried to achieve with your forthcoming fourth album? How is it different from you past work?
"With this record we tried to ignore all the cosmetic nonsense and focus on becoming a truly great rock band. We felt that the world needed a really straight and pure rock band, you're hard pressed to find a lot of those these days. It was less about the theatricality and more about how we become the greatest young American rock band musically."

How are you adapting to fatherhood?
"It's great, it's amazing. Obviously we just wanted a healthy baby, but I was excited to have a girl as there are things I can see myself helping a girl with that I could never do with a guy, things like picking out clothes and stealing eyeliner, all that sort of stuff!"

Mod note: As happy and excited as we are that people are starting to discuss and converse in the comments, we'd like to remind everyone to play nicely.

Comments

[spuzz.livejournal.com]

Your last point is really interesting as well. I wonder if that's because he DOES have a girl that people already believe he kind of knows her enough and that it's easier to use a hypothetical baby as an example because it doesn't exist? I'm not sure if that question made sense, oops. But I think what I'm trying to say is it may be easier to go the opposite route instead of the route based more in "reality" (eg what Gerard is presenting as reality) because you can say "what if [insert possibility]"? Because it does present both sides of the gender issue because one side (the "girl" side if you will) was already given (by Gerard).

It's really early so I'm not sure any of that made sense. So to sum up: the point about Bandit may not even liking eyeliner or whatever is super problematic, good point!

Edited: wow reading over that it really made no sense.

[manhattan-blue.livejournal.com]

I have to disagree with that tbh because Gerard himself represents the male side of the gender roles in the way that he's broken them. This fandom seems to be pretty hard-wired to defend men, because it is so male-dominated, and their right to break stereotypes. Women don't play a large part in bandom and maybe that's why we're all so eager to rush to the aid of the repressed, but hypothetical, baby boy. Or maybe it is, once more, our larger society.

[spuzz.livejournal.com]

Fascinating way to put it and I absolutely agree both with the fact that this fandom itself defends men as well as our larger society.